|
2#

楼主 |
发表于 2006-11-7 19:40:29
|
只看该作者
If one separated digital into two basic camps, there'd be entries like the AMR, Audio Aero, Audio Note, BAT, Opera Droplet, Kondo, Lector, Metronome, Reimyo, Resolution Audio and Zanden on one side; the Benchmark, dCS, Dodson, Linn, Meitner, Wadia and Weiss units on the other. That the first group often uses tubes isn't an essential qualifier; nor that some of its machines shun up/oversampling or filtering. That those in the second group nearly categorically avoid such retro approaches is probably emblematic though. One school approaches digital from analog precedents. It attempts, by various means, to reintroduce certain organic ingredients that its makers feel digital compromises compared to vinyl or master tape. Measurements of such machines may suffer compared to the second school which focuses on ultimate detail retrieval and dynamic range. Boundaries here of course are fluid. The best designs will focus on the common ground in the middle without pursuing extremes. How they parlay is additionally contingent on system voicing. Still, for purposes of categorization, such a separation into classes is useful to quickly capture general flavors.----------Srajan Ebaen, Chief editor of 6moons
译文如下:
如果将当今HIFI数码CD机分成两个阵营的话,AMR、Audio Aero、Audio Note、BAT、Opera Droplet(欧博水滴)、Kondo、Lector、Metronome、Musial Fidelity、Reimyo、Resolution Audio and Zanden为一方,Krell、Mark Levinson、Burmester、Lindemann、Benchmark、Esoteric、dCS、Dodson、Meridian、Linn、Meitener、Audionet、Wadia and Weiss为另一方。第一阵营经常使用电子管,不属于从本质上提升音质的作法,也不属于有意避免升频和滤波那一类,上述两种作法正是第二阵营所极力避免的所谓“倒退”的技术,此为第二阵营的标志性分野。第一阵营崇尚从先辈的模拟技术中通过各种方法吸取精华以折衷数码音源与黑胶/母带的音质区别。第一阵营的测试指标与至力于对细节和动态作最终修补的第二阵营相比是相当不利的。当然两个阵营的边界是不清晰的,或者说不是固定不变的。最好的设计将是那些位居中间的至力于两者的共同点而不是各自追求极致的产品。如何发挥最大的效果则视搭配的系统而定。这样的分类有助于快速了解世界范围内HIFI数码CD机总体的设计理念。
-------Srajan Ebaen, Chief editor of 6moons
水滴能名列其中是很不容易的! |
|