威虹新到卡玛 Ceramique Reference Monitor 3.2.2 音箱

weihong · 发表于 2009-11-2 10:54:45

我在飞高。 The ASR integrated pushes all the right buttons. 综合推动的ASR所有正确的按钮。 Needless to say, the EM pushes them all, too. The sound was on par with my reference—the mbl 8011 AM monoblocks, 5011 preamp, and these speakers. 不用说，他们的EM的推动，也。声音是对我的参考标准杆的简称MBL 8011上午冷库，5011前置放大器，而这些扬声器。 This was superb sound that I'm sure any rational audiophile would unhesitatingly consider delectable companionship for their imaginary desert island endgame. 这是极好的声音，我相信任何合理的发烧友会毫不犹豫地考虑他们的想象荒岛残局美味的陪伴。

I anticipated a serious letdown when I swapped in the newly arrived Kharma CRM 3.2.2 speakers, simply due to the fact they are five levels down the line. 我所预料的严重让人失望，当我在新来的卡尔玛的CRM 3.2.2发言交换，只是因为事实上他们是五线的水平下降。 Certainly, most performance parameters did deteriorate, but in one important, unforeseen way, they surpassed the EM. 当然，大多数的性能参数没有恶化，但在一个重要的，不可预见的方式，他们超过了电磁。 So, on balance, they held their own. 因此，总的来说，他们认为自己的。 Let me back up a bit and explain. 让我回了一下，解释。

I rated the mbl 8011AM amps a best buy when I reviewed them. 余评为简称MBL 8011AM安培最佳买进，当我回顾他们。 They sound terrific strapped to the E-Ms. 他们健全的出色绑在电子女士。 But one must consider this speaker's nominal four-ohm load, dipping to the high two's. 但我们必须考虑这个演讲者的名义4欧姆负载，跌至两高的。 Even though they are reasonably efficient (90dB sensitivity), the rule of thumb is the lower the impedance, the more difficult the load. The EM is a tough load for an amp to grapple with. 即使是合理有效的（90dB的灵敏度），经验法则是低阻抗，更困难的负载。的电磁是一个放大器拼强硬的负载。

The 8011 AMs are not an optimal match. They're not designed to carry this kind of impedance load. 在8011 AMS是不是最佳匹配。他们并不是设计用来携带这种阻抗负载类型。 I know this from having sampled the next up mbl Reference Line 9007 monos paired with the E-Ms. 我知道这不必取样下了海洋生物实验参考线9007莫诺斯与E -女士配对。 Over the course of a couple of weeks, that pairing provided the ticket to a destination I shall not easily forget, establishing an enduring high-water mark. 过去的几个星期当然，配对提供了机票到目的地，我不会轻易忘记，建立一个持久的高水位。 (For the record, the 9007s spec 570 into four-ohms, and have a grand 1900 watts available at peak power. The 8011 AMs spec 310 watts into four-ohms, with a peak power rating of 1100. And the Emitter specs nearly the same: 290 into four-ohms. There's more involved, but power ratings can give you a good indication of an amps' ability to handle a speaker.) （根据记录，在9007s规格分为四个570欧姆，并有大一九○○瓦特可在峰值功率。肺泡的8011规格三百十瓦特分为四个欧姆与1100峰值功率等级。极和发射极近的规格同样的：到4欧姆290。还有更多的参与，但额定功率可以给你一个放大器的能力，处理者很好地说明。）

Reality and practicality came knocking, however, droving my decision to acquire the 8011 AM monos: they are smaller and weigh less than the 9007s, of course, but mainly they cost a hell of a lot less. 现实和实用性来敲门，但droving我决定购买8011上午莫诺斯：他们是更小，重量小于9007s，当然，但主要是他们的成本少了很多地狱。

So the EM was holding back, through no fault of its own—through no component's fault actually—because so much depends on synergy. 因此，电磁是阻碍，通过没有自己的过错，不通过组件的过错，其实，因为这在很大程度上取决于协同作用。

weihong · 发表于 2009-11-2 10:56:01

我在飞高。 The ASR integrated pushes all the right buttons. 综合推动的ASR所有正确的按钮。 Needless to say, the EM pushes them all, too. The sound was on par with my reference—the mbl 8011 AM monoblocks, 5011 preamp, and these speakers. 不用说，他们的EM的推动，也。声音是对我的参考标准杆的简称MBL 8011上午冷库，5011前置放大器，而这些扬声器。 This was superb sound that I'm sure any rational audiophile would unhesitatingly consider delectable companionship for their imaginary desert island endgame. 这是极好的声音，我相信任何合理的发烧友会毫不犹豫地考虑他们的想象荒岛残局美味的陪伴。

I anticipated a serious letdown when I swapped in the newly arrived Kharma CRM 3.2.2 speakers, simply due to the fact they are five levels down the line. 我所预料的严重让人失望，当我在新来的卡尔玛的CRM 3.2.2发言交换，只是因为事实上他们是五线的水平下降。 Certainly, most performance parameters did deteriorate, but in one important, unforeseen way, they surpassed the EM. 当然，大多数的性能参数没有恶化，但在一个重要的，不可预见的方式，他们超过了电磁。 So, on balance, they held their own. 因此，总的来说，他们认为自己的。 Let me back up a bit and explain. 让我回了一下，解释。

I rated the mbl 8011AM amps a best buy when I reviewed them. 余评为简称MBL 8011AM安培最佳买进，当我回顾他们。 They sound terrific strapped to the E-Ms. 他们健全的出色绑在电子女士。 But one must consider this speaker's nominal four-ohm load, dipping to the high two's. 但我们必须考虑这个演讲者的名义4欧姆负载，跌至两高的。 Even though they are reasonably efficient (90dB sensitivity), the rule of thumb is the lower the impedance, the more difficult the load. The EM is a tough load for an amp to grapple with. 即使是合理有效的（90dB的灵敏度），经验法则是低阻抗，更困难的负载。的电磁是一个放大器拼强硬的负载。

The 8011 AMs are not an optimal match. They're not designed to carry this kind of impedance load. 在8011 AMS是不是最佳匹配。他们并不是设计用来携带这种阻抗负载类型。 I know this from having sampled the next up mbl Reference Line 9007 monos paired with the E-Ms. 我知道这不必取样下了海洋生物实验参考线9007莫诺斯与E -女士配对。 Over the course of a couple of weeks, that pairing provided the ticket to a destination I shall not easily forget, establishing an enduring high-water mark. 过去的几个星期当然，配对提供了机票到目的地，我不会轻易忘记，建立一个持久的高水位。 (For the record, the 9007s spec 570 into four-ohms, and have a grand 1900 watts available at peak power. The 8011 AMs spec 310 watts into four-ohms, with a peak power rating of 1100. And the Emitter specs nearly the same: 290 into four-ohms. There's more involved, but power ratings can give you a good indication of an amps' ability to handle a speaker.) （根据记录，在9007s规格分为四个570欧姆，并有大一九○○瓦特可在峰值功率。肺泡的8011规格三百十瓦特分为四个欧姆与1100峰值功率等级。极和发射极近的规格同样的：到4欧姆290。还有更多的参与，但额定功率可以给你一个放大器的能力，处理者很好地说明。）

Reality and practicality came knocking, however, droving my decision to acquire the 8011 AM monos: they are smaller and weigh less than the 9007s, of course, but mainly they cost a hell of a lot less. 现实和实用性来敲门，但droving我决定购买8011上午莫诺斯：他们是更小，重量小于9007s，当然，但主要是他们的成本少了很多地狱。

So the EM was holding back, through no fault of its own—through no component's fault actually—because so much depends on synergy. 因此，电磁是阻碍，通过没有自己的过错，不通过组件的过错，其实，因为这在很大程度上取决于协同作用。

Vitality 活力

Like any other component, speakers more or less replicate changes in the signal to the best of their ability. 像任何其他组件，扬声器或多或少重复信号的变化，以他们的能力最好的。 An action commences, the signal changes, and they give you an indication of what happened. 一个行动开始时，信号的变化，他们给你一个发生了什么指示。 But it's never complete. 但它永远不会完成。 Either it's stifled, like when a crescendo runs out of gas and hits a ceiling before the musicians have completed the phrase, or maybe it changes quality and becomes hard and glassy. 要么是窒息，就像当顶峰运行的天然气和点击的音乐家之前完成的短语，或者它可能变化的高质量，成为硬玻璃天花板。 Consider that this kind of blockage can be overall, the sound just poops out and stops expanding, or it can affect particular frequencies. 认为这是一种可以堵塞全面，公正poops声音出来停止扩建，也可以影响到特定的频率。 Typically it's the bass that poops out, but it's possible anywhere, in the upper-mids, for example. 通常它是低音的poops，但是它可能在任何位置上，中频，例如。 There isn't a speaker made, or an amp, that gives you true-to-life dynamics. 没有一个发言者提出，或放大器，这使你真实的生活动态。 The guilty party may even be the interface between them, how the two react together. 有罪的一方，甚至可能是它们之间的接口，这两个反应如何一起。 (This is the situation with the mbl 8011s and the EM). （这是与海洋生物实验8011s和电磁情况）。 The outcome is the same: it's left up to your grey matter to fill in the shortfall. 其结果是相同的：它留给你的灰质以填补缺口。

When an amp and speaker are working synergistically, a more complete action is possible. 当功放和扬声器的工作协同，更完整的行动是可能的。 If they rise to the occasion, and still manage to maintain coherency and overall quality, the net result is going to be far more convincing. 如果他们挺身而出，并仍能保持连贯性和整体素质，最终结果将是更有说服力。

What happens in such a relationship? 会发生什么？在这样的关系

The amp becomes the master and the speaker its willing slave. 这款放大器成为主人和扬声器其愿意奴隶。 When the amp barks out orders, the speaker says "Yes, sir!" 当了订单放大器树皮，发言人说：“是的，先生！” and snaps to attention. 并对齐的注意。 What it means is whatever signal the amp is passing is transmuted into SPLs with a BIG source of distortion removed from the chain. 言下之意，是任何信号放大器的通过，是蜕变成声压级与大的失真从链中删除源。 What it means is you get the clearest and cleanest sound either component is capable of. 言下之意，就是，你得到的最明确和最清洁的部件声音能够。 You hear more signal and less mechanical artifact. 你听到更多的信号，减少机械工件。

Here's where we factor in an amp at the caliber of the ASR Emitter I and a transducer at the level of the CRM 3.2.2. 下面是一个放大器的因素，我们在语音识别发射我和在客户关系管理水平传感器口径3.2.2。 The Emitter I is very nearly a category killer in terms of the quality and range of its dynamics. 发射器我是一个非常接近的质量和动态范围的类别来看杀手。 And the CRM 3.2.2, with the same 90 dB sensitivity as the EM, makes this amp much happier. 和CRM 3.2.2相同的90分贝的电磁敏感性，使这一放大器愉快得多。 With its nominal six-ohm load not dipping below four, the amp has a load it is designed to handle. 凭借其标称6欧姆负载不低于4浸渍，该放大器具有它是专门用来处理负载。

The CRM 3.2.2, for its part, is in its element. 3.2.2为客户关系管理的一部分，它的元素。 With sufficient damping factor provided by the amp, driver recovery time is optimized. 只要有足够的阻尼因素所提供的放大器，驱动恢复时间进行了优化。 The signal moved around over Kubala-Sosna wires fast as blazes, able to throw quick jabs and recover without leaving an opening, so to speak. 走遍信号对库巴拉，绍什瑙大火快线，能快速申诉委员会和扔不离开开幕恢复，以便发言。 There's no blockage, no stifling of the intent. 有没有堵塞，没有意图扼杀。 Imagine for a moment a no-nonsense sound field. ，一会儿想象一种实事求是的声场。 There's no fog, no mist, it's like a clear, sunny day, like looking out at the ocean and seeing for miles, the kind of day photographers dream about, the kind of day featured in too many of those allergy medication commercials. 有没有雾，没有雾，就像一个明确的，晴天的，就像你在大海，看到数英里，一天中的一种摄影师梦想，在太多的抗过敏药物广告，许多种类的特色天。 The colors are all pure and crisp; vision is 20/20. 这些颜色都是纯粹和清晰，远景是20/20。

Sure, it's a matter of transparency and detail retrieval. 当然，这是一个透明和详细的检索问题。 Clearly these, and everything else on the check-off list, can't be laggards. 显然，这些，一切都在支票上其他富裕名单，不能落后。 But there's something else. 但还有别的东西。

The CRM 3.2.2 has an inordinately energetic transient response, such that the smallest dynamic shadings are made obvious. 客户关系管理3.2.2有一个充满活力的瞬态响应不相称，这样，最小的动态阴影是取得了明显的。 And it allows the biggest dynamic shifts room to expand. ，它允许的最大空间扩大的动态变化。 (Not to say full expansion, but enough to make you feel it's not blocked.) It has dynamic openness . （不是说完全扩张，但足以让你觉得它没有被阻挡。）具有活力的开放性。 This is very often the missing ingredient that prevents our suspension of disbelief. 这往往缺少的成分，可以防止我们的怀疑暂停。 And it is the CRM 3.2.2s most outstanding characteristic. 它是客户关系管理3.2.2s最突出的特征。

Dudes who came by to hear this system simply uttered, "Yeah. That's got it." 花花公子谁在听到这个系统，只需说出，“来啊。那是得到了。”

weihong · 发表于 2009-11-2 10:56:21

吃火锅'东经健：客户关系管理3.2

FAQ: What does it have in common with its little brother? 常见问题：是什么在共同与它的小兄弟？

You may recall when the Kharma CRM 3.2. 你可以回想一下，卡尔玛的CRM 3.2。 was introduced seven years ago, it rocked the high-end firmament. 介绍了7年前，它震撼了高端苍穹。 It was the toast of the town. 那是大受鼓舞。 This world-famous two-way punctured long-standing barriers and pushed the outer limits of transparency. 这个世界著名的双向刺破长期障碍，推动透明度的外部界限。

It may be two years since I had the CRM 3.2 in my living room, but I can still tell that the sound of the CRM 3.2.2 comes from the same place—as it should, being designed to follow in its footsteps. 这可能是两年，因为我在我的客厅了CRM 3.2，但我仍然可以告诉各位，客户关系管理3.2.2声音来自同一个地方，它应该被设计沿用了脚步。

All of the sibling traits are there: the same disappearing act; the see-through or see-into soundstage; the purity and speed; the major league frequency integration and transient coherency; the timbral treatment; even the size and shape of the soundfield and its characteristic images. 性状的兄弟姐妹都存在：在同一消失行为;的透视或看到成音- -;的纯度和速度，在大联盟一体化和瞬态频率一致性;的音色处理，甚至的大小和形状的声场和其特征图像。 In short, if you ever heard the 3.2s, you'll recognize the sound of the 3.2.2s. 总之，如果你听过3.2s，你会承认3.2.2s声音。

Appearance-wise, the CRM 3.2.2 falls in with the rest of the Ceramique line and is up to Kharma's reputation for the finest finishes. 外观的角度来看，客户关系管理3.2.2是符合的陶瓷行的其余部分及符合卡尔玛对完成最好的声誉。 I'm sure it's a considerable factor in its pricing (MSRP $33,500). 我相信这是一个在其价格（价格三十三点五零零美元相当因素）。 The CRM 3.2.2, like its little sibling, will fit most small and medium rooms, where they visually and sonically disappear. Parts quality is the same: internal wiring is Kharma silver-gold wires; there are the Kharma cross-braced SDSS stands; the heavy-duty spike feet, and a rear port. 客户关系管理3.2.2它的小兄弟一样，最适合中小型房间，在那里他们视觉和音质消失。零部件的质量是一样的：内部布线是卡尔玛银金线，还有的卡尔玛交叉支撑SDSS的立场，重型穗英尺，港口后方。

A couple of guys complained about warm and loose bass, which they attributed to the port. 一个家伙夫妇抱怨温暖和宽松的低音，他们由于港口。 It turned out, they all own sealed enclosure speakers. 原来，他们都讲自己的密封外壳。 They are used to the tight and tuneful bass that design produces. 他们习惯了紧张，悦耳的低音，设计生产。 This is a matter of taste. 这是口味的问题。 Personally, I find this kind of bass overly tight and unnatural. 就个人而言，我觉得这是一种过分的低音紧，不自然。

FAQ: How does it differ from its little brother? 常见问题：如何从它的小兄弟有什么不同？

The obvious physical differences are the addition of a second 7" concave Accuton ceramic driver and the larger cabinet size, but there's more. 最明显的生理差异是第二个7“凹Accuton陶瓷司机和另外规模较大的内阁，但还有更多。

weihong · 发表于 2009-11-2 10:56:37

一方面，高音是新的。 The CRM 3.2.2 employs a re-designed, in-house manufactured tweeter. 客户关系管理3.2.2采用了重新设计，内部制造的高音。 The one on the CRM 3.2 I knew had a tendency to dominate and was somewhat thin—actually, flesh was somewhat thin all around. 关于客户关系管理3.2 1我知道有一个主导的趋势，是稍嫌单薄，实际上，肉体稍嫌单薄各地。 Occasionally it threw temper tantrums. 有时它扔发脾气。 It was excitable. 这是激动。 (I'm talking about the first production CRM 3.2s, which had a 1.5" inverted-dome titanium, Kharma-modified, Focal tweeter. Current production CRM 3.2s use the same tweeter as the CRM 3.2.2.) The CRM 3.2s are also brighter sounding, albeit, it's treble is supple and nuanced. The space conjured by the CRM 3.2s is smaller, more intimate and seductive. （我说的第一个生产性的CRM 3.2s，它有一个1.5“倒球钛，卡尔玛改造，重点高音。目前生产的CRM 3.2s使用相同高音的CRM 3.2.2。）客户关系管理3.2 s是听起来也明亮，虽然，它的高音是柔软和细致。由客户关系管理3.2s别有用心的空间更小，更亲密和诱人。

The CRM 3.2.2s treble is more controlled and I'm happy to report, has more flesh and body in keeping with the frequencies below. 客户关系管理3.2.2s高音是更多的控制，我很高兴地报告，在下面的频率与更符合肉和身体。 Still, there is no excess here—you don't want to mate it with analytical ancillaries. 但是，有没有多余这里，你不想交配它与分析辅助设备。

The design is called a 2.5 way, where the identical mid/bass drivers cover overlapping frequencies. 该设计被称为2.5的方式，在相同的中/低音驱动器覆盖重叠的频率。 This necessitates a more complicated crossover than the CRM 3.2, a true two-way, but for the life of me, I can't hear it. 这就需要比的CRM 3.2，一个真正的双向的，更复杂的交叉，而是为了我的生活，我不能听到。 Still, the CRM 3.2 is marginally more invisible. 尽管如此，客户关系管理3.2是稍微多一些无形。 Note that both models spec down to 35 Hz, but oh, what a difference in output levels at that point! 请注意，这两个模型规格下降到35赫兹，但哦，在这一点上的差异产出水平！ That extra mid/woof gives you a low-end with substantially more usable output. Another thing: the bigger and heavier cabinet (110 vs. 70 lbs for the CRM 3.2s), means the CRM 3.2.2s are able to move considerably more air and pressurize the room more fully. 额外的中/纬让您大幅度增加可用输出低端。另一件事：更大更重柜（110与70的CRM 3.2s磅），是指客户关系管理3.2.2s能够移动相当多的加压空气和更充分的余地。

The quantity and quality of the low frequencies is perfectly satisfying for the genres I listen to—classical and acoustic jazz—even enough to suggest a full orchestra. 的数量和质量低频率是完全满意的风格我听古典和爵士乐声，甚至不足以表明一个完整的乐队。 You won't be thinking about augmenting them with a powered sub, as I did when I owned the CRM 3.2s, unless you're into amplified jazz or rock, which uses synthesizers and such. 你不会想到，增补一名核潜艇他们和我一样，当我拥有的客户关系管理3.2s，除非你将扩增爵士乐或摇滚乐，使用合成器等。